Emerson Process Management Website Home Emerson Corporate BusinessEmerson Corporate website Company OverviewEmerson Corporate BrandsEmerson Corporate Investor Relations  
Search Emerson Process Management WebsiteEmerson Process Management PlantWebEmerson Process Management Global Presence


"Seating Profile - The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly."

Much has been said about seating profile.  But before we get to far into the conversation, I must warn you that although a bad seating profile (degradation from benchmark comparison) typically indicates a worn or bad seat, a good seating profile does not necessarily mean that the seat is good and will meet the design shutoff classification.

What is "Seat Profile"?  Seating profile is the expanded view of the valve signature (net pressure vs. travel curve) at the closed position and is used to provide a comparative indication as to the integrity of the seat.  It is characterized as an abrupt change in slope from that shown throughout the normal travel range.  The change in slope is due to the higher spring rate or stiffness of the actuator parts reacting to the forces being applied to the seat (i.e. stretching of the actuator yoke legs, expansion of the diaphragm housing, compression of the valve/actuator stems, etc.).  When using the FlowScanner, the profile can appear as a "stair stepping" action or as a very fine "saw tooth" action.  This appearance is due to the resolution of the travel transducer used during the test.  Travel transducers such as the 50" Celesco and 4" DRC have a resolution of 0.001".  Each 0.001" movement provides one count, or travel measurement point, and thus produces the stair step image when plotted against change in net actuator pressure.  On the other hand, the 25" Celesco and 2" DRC have a resolution of 0.0001 and hence the smaller steps or saw tooth profile.  Although the appearance may differ between transducers, the slope would remain the same.

Seating Profile is best utilized as a comparative tool.  By obtaining a "benchmark" test of the valve when the seating surfaces are known to be good, it is just a simple matter to overlay any succeeding tests and view for any developing changes in the profile.  To illustrate this, let’s view the following examples.

Good Seat Profile

Here we see an example of a benchmark test of a good seat.  Notice the sharp transition in slope as the valve makes its initial seat contact. This is the area in which you pay close attention.   You should see the sharp transition plus you should note the amount of travel that is displayed from this point of seat contact until the actuator runs out of force (zero pressure for reverse acting actuators, full supply pressure for direct acting actuators).   The travel to force relationship shows the seating material softness and/or the stiffness of the actuator parts.  This travel will be greater for a PTFE seat then that of a metal seat.  It will also increase when there is damage or wear present on the seat.

By zooming in on the seating area, we can obtain a well-defined seating profile. Typically a 0.050" or 0.060" travel range is ample zoom for defining the seating profile.  Any further zooming just muddies the waters and can make even a good profile look ugly.

Too much zoom

Here we see the results of further zooming in on the above profile.  Increased zoom does have its place though.   For instance, if you are looking for subtle changes between today’s trace with one taken previously.  This is typically done by overlaying the two graphs.

 

Overlay

Speaking of overlays, it is now time to compare today’s test results with those from the original "benchmark" test.  Notice that the spring rate transition on today’s test is not nearly as crisp as it was on the original test of this valve.  Also notice that the travel from point of seat contact is much more then that of the original test.  This is a very reliable indication that there is a problem in the seating area of this valve.  In this case, the seating areas of both the valve plug and seat ring were found to damaged from debris flowing through the pipeline.

Now that we have viewed a "Good" and a "Bad" seating profile, let’s close with an "Ugly" one.

"Ugly" Profile

In viewing this seating profile, we see the valve contacting the seat and then what appears to be the start of a typical seating profile.  But then we see an additional 0.020" travel with no increase in force.  This is very atypical.  The valve was opened for inspection.  The seat ring had nearly eroded away.

<< Back to Dabbling in Diagnostics Index



Last Updated 11/12/08


© Emerson, 1996-2008
Legal
 and Privacy Statements